🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing group of countries are moving toward parallel measures.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our children's youth". Legislation may be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to pass a law lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a advisory motion supporting a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is provided. Although it warns of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a useful foundation," stated a leading European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the government has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. However, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. One foundation founded by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after viewing harmful social media material argues that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for young users," said a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, legislation is largely unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures demanding adult authorization for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from certain politicians to follow this example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Apart from these regions, other states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies take a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even backfire". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

While this international conversation continues, the policies of this nation and others demonstrate that governments around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.